DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2
Hits 1 – 20 of 23

1
The impact of the CEFR on language examinations in local contexts
Bérešová, Jana. - Frankfurt am Main : PL Academic Research, 2017. Bratislava : VEDA, 2017
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
2
DSH - deutsche Sprachprüfung für den Hochschulzugang. - Prüfungstraining Deutsch : DSH - Deutsche Sprachprüfung für den Hochschulzugang : DSH - deutsche Sprachprüfung für den Hochschulzugang. -
Mozer, Isolde. - Berlin : Cornelsen, 2017
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
3
The C-Test: A Valid Measure to Test Second Language Proficiency?
In: https://hal-hprints.archives-ouvertes.fr/hprints-01491274 ; 2017 (2017)
BASE
Show details
4
Nobert Heimken: Migration, Bildung und Spracherwerb. Bildungssozialisation und Integration von Jugendlichen aus Einwandererfamilien. Wiesbaden: Springer VS 2017 (165 S.) [Rezension] ...
Beier, Frank. - : Klinkhardt, 2017
BASE
Show details
5
Sprache im italienischen Erdkundeunterricht. Eine multiperspektivische Studie ...
Schöber, Stephanie. - : Budrich UniPress Ltd., 2017
BASE
Show details
6
Sprache im italienischen Erdkundeunterricht. Eine multiperspektivische Studie
Schöber, Stephanie. - : Budrich UniPress Ltd., 2017. : Opladen, 2017. : Berlin, 2017. : Toronto, 2017. : pedocs-Dokumentenserver/DIPF, 2017
In: Opladen ; Berlin ; Toronto : Budrich UniPress Ltd. 2017, 658 S. (2017)
BASE
Show details
7
Nobert Heimken: Migration, Bildung und Spracherwerb. Bildungssozialisation und Integration von Jugendlichen aus Einwandererfamilien. Wiesbaden: Springer VS 2017 (165 S.) [Rezension]
In: Erziehungswissenschaftliche Revue (EWR) 16 (2017) 5 (2017)
BASE
Show details
8
Challenging the power invested in the International English Language Testing System (IELTS): Why determining ‘English’ preparedness needs to be undertaken within the subject context
Pilcher, Nick; Richards, Kendall. - : SAGE Publications, 2017
BASE
Show details
9
Locus of Control in L2 English Listening Assessment
In: Applied Linguistics and English as a Second Language Dissertations (2017)
BASE
Show details
10
Communicative-Pragmatic Assessment Is Sensitive and Time-Effective in Measuring the Outcome of Aphasia Therapy ...
Stahl, Benjamin; Mohr, Bettina; Dreyer, Felix R.. - : Freie Universität Berlin, 2017
BASE
Show details
11
Researching participants taking IELTS Academic Writing Task 2 (AWT2) in paper mode and in computer mode in terms of score equivalence, cognitive validity and other factors
Chan, Sathena Hiu Chong; Bax, Stephen; Weir, Cyril J.. - : British Council and IDP: IELTS Australia, 2017
Abstract: Computer-based (CB) assessment is becoming more common in most university disciplines, and international language testing bodies now routinely use computers for many areas of English language assessment. Given that, in the near future, IELTS also will need to move towards offering CB options alongside traditional paper-based (PB) modes, the research reported here prepares for that possibility, building on research carried out some years ago which investigated the statistical comparability of the IELTS writing test between the two delivery modes, and offering a fresh look at the relevant issues. By means of questionnaire and interviews, the current study investigates the extent to which 153 test-takers’ cognitive processes, while completing IELTS Academic Writing in PB mode and in CB mode, compare with the real-world cognitive processes of students completing academic writing at university. A major contribution of our study is its use – for the first time in the academic literature – of data from research into cognitive processes within real-world academic settings as a comparison with cognitive processing during academic writing under test conditions. The most important conclusion from the study is that according to the 5-facet MFRM analysis, there were no significant differences in the scores awarded by two independent raters for candidates’ performances on the tests taken under two conditions, one paper-and-pencil and the other computer. Regarding analytic scores criteria, the differences in three areas (i.e. Task Achievement, Coherence and Cohesion, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy) were not significant, but the difference reported in Lexical Resources was significant, if slight. In summary, the difference of scores between the two modes is at an acceptable level. With respect to the cognitive processes students employ in performing under the two conditions of the test, results of the Cognitive Process Questionnaire (CPQ) survey indicate a similar pattern between the cognitive processes involved in writing on a computer and writing with paper-and-pencil. There were no noticeable major differences in the general tendency of the mean of each questionnaire item reported on the two test modes. In summary, the cognitive processes were employed in a similar fashion under the two delivery conditions. Based on the interview data (n=30), it appears that the participants reported using most of the processes in a similar way between the two modes. Nevertheless, a few potential differences indicated by the interview data might be worth further investigation in future studies. The Computer Familiarity Questionnaire survey shows that these students in general are familiar with computer usage and their overall reactions towards working with a computer are positive. Multiple regression analysis, used to find out if computer familiarity had any effect on students’ performances on the two modes, suggested that test-takers who do not have a suitable familiarity profile might perform slightly worse than those who do, in computer mode. In summary, the research offered in this report offers a unique comparison with realworld academic writing, and presents a significant contribution to the research base which IELTS and comparable international testing bodies will need to consider, if they are to introduce CB test versions in future.
Keyword: computer-based testing; L2 writing; language assessment; language testing; testing; writing; writing assessment; X162 Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL)
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10547/622176
BASE
Hide details
12
Exploring performance across two delivery modes for the same L2 speaking test: face-to-face and video-conferencing delivery: a preliminary comparison of test-taker and examiner behaviour
Nakatsuhara, Fumiyo; Inoue, Chihiro; Berry, Vivien. - : The IELTS Partners: British Council, Cambridge English Language Assessment and IDP: IELTS Australia, 2017
BASE
Show details
13
Language assessment literacy for learning-oriented language assessment
Hamp-Lyons, Liz. - : Australian Association of Applied Linguistics, 2017
BASE
Show details
14
Exploring performance across two delivery modes for the IELTS Speaking Test: face-to-face and video-conferencing delivery (Phase 2)
Nakatsuhara, Fumiyo; Berry, Vivien; Inoue, Chihiro. - : IELTS Partners, 2017
BASE
Show details
15
Testing four skills in Japan
Green, Anthony. - : Japan Society of English Language Education, 2017
BASE
Show details
16
Assessing English on the global stage : the British Council and English language testing, 1941-2016
Weir, Cyril J.; O'Sullivan, Barry. - : Equinox, 2017
BASE
Show details
17
Demonstrating the cognitive validity and face validity of PTE Academic Writing items Summarize Written Text and Write Essay
Chan, Sathena Hiu Chong. - : Pearson, 2017
BASE
Show details
18
Reviewing the suitability of English language tests for providing the GMC with evidence of doctors' English proficiency
Taylor, Lynda; Chan, Sathena Hiu Chong. - : The General Medical Council, 2017
BASE
Show details
19
Rating scale development: a multistage exploratory sequential design ; Second language assessment and mixed methods research
Galaczi, Evelina D.; Khabbazbashi, Nahal. - : Cambridge University Press, 2017
BASE
Show details
20
A new test for China? Stages in the development of an assessment for professional purposes.
Jin, Yan; Hamp-Lyons, Liz. - : Taylor & Francis, 2017
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2

Catalogues
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
21
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern